Friday, November 30, 2007

Orphan of the Storm


With another School Board work session on Jefferson-Houston looming on December 13, this may be a good time to try to answer a question that frequently crops up in Parker-Gray.

Above and beyond academic issues — and they are defining issues to many parents here — why hasn't the neighborhood invested emotionally in Jefferson-Houston and joined forces to turn it around the way Rosemont recommitted to Maury School? The school is so tantalizingly close, so convenient for busy young parents, why isn't it possible to forge the same bond that Del Ray enjoys with Mt. Vernon School and Northridge with George Mason?

The Growler believes the answer lies in history. With segregation, integration, busing, and resegregation in Alexandria's schools over the last half century, Jefferson-Houston may never have really commanded anyone's devotion or nostalgia. In that respect, it is unfortunately quite distinct from Maury, Mt. Vernon and George Mason.

The illustration above may explain why our school is so little loved. It's a photograph of Jefferson Elementary School, a whites-only school built in 1920 at Queen and West Streets, just five years after all-white Alexandria High School was built next door. (With the construction of George Washington High School in 1935 AHS closed and became an annex to the primary school.)

Historically, young African-American children in our neighborhood were not educated at the site of the current Jefferson-Houston school. Dating from the mid-19th century, Hallowell School for Girls on Pitt Street and Snowden School for Boys on Alfred Street (in our neighborhood) were the first Alexandria schools for blacks.

In 1920 these historic schools were consolidated in a new building at 900 Wythe Street, which was named Parker-Gray Elementary after two revered figures: Hallowell principal Sarah Gray and Snowden principal John Parker.

The new Parker-Gray Elementary was so bare and underfunded that the community had to donate chairs and basic equipment. It was soon overcrowded, so in the early 1930s another segregated school, Lyles-Crouch, was built to handle the overflow of students.

Until the 1930s, education for Alexandria blacks ended at the 8th grade. The brightest and most determined pupils were forced to head to Washington, D.C. to attend either Dunbar or Armstrong high schools. It was embittering for many African-Americans who lived directly across the street from Alexandria High School or walked past it regularly to be reminded on a daily basis that they were being denied an opportunity to achieve higher education and earn a diploma.

The City finally relented. Parker-Gray extended its classes through 12th grade and in 1936 its first high school class matriculated. In 1950 when the school had outgrown its many additions a new Parker-Gray High School was opened nearby at 1207 Madison Street.

If any of the now-vanished schools in our neighborhood were vested with intense community pride, it was Parker-Gray High School. But this too was tempered with sadness and even resentment. Students at the segregated school never received new books or new band uniforms. Instead, they were given the second-hand castoffs from white George Washington High School.

Parker-Gray's lifespan was brief, lasting only 15 years (1950-1965). With the initial integration of Alexandria's schools in 1964, it was transformed into a middle school in 1965 and neighborhood teens sent instead to George Washington or T.C. Williams for high school. The Parker-Gray school building finally closed in 1979 and was ultimately demolished. The Madison Street townhomes now stand on the site of the former school.

Back to the elementary schools. When the new Parker-Gray High School was built, the original elementary school of the same name was renamed Charles Houston School in honor of the prominent attorney and Howard Law School Dean who wrote the Supreme Court brief in Brown vs. the Board of Education that finally toppled segregation. According to Mabel Lyles' book Caught Between Two Systems: Desegregating Alexandria's Schools 1954-1973, Houston had helped local black families acquire the new Parker-Gray High School.

By the late 1960s, Jefferson School was closed and there were discussions about reopening it as a middle school. But in 1968 this plan was abandoned and a new elementary school planned for the corner of Cameron and West. Charles Houston School was then closed and Jefferson School and its annex were demolished.

Yet the legacy of these formerly segregated institutions still lingered. Although the pupils and teachers at Charles Houston School were to be shifted to the new location, the School Board initially voted in a secret ballot to name the new school "Thomas Jefferson School." Board member Ferdinand Day and other prominent black citizens were outraged. Although the Board claimed its decision was made to prevent confusion with the new community center, it compromised in the end and "Jefferson-Houston" was born. (To put this in historical context, in the same era a Confederate flag was still draped prominently behind the Council dais at City Hall.)

When the new Jefferson-Houston Elementary School finally opened its doors in 1971, it had nearly 1,000 black pupils and only three white students. Soon after, however, busing was launched in Alexandria to achieve racial equality. Jefferson-Houston was paired with William Ramsey, a mostly white school in the West End, and pupils from both communities were shipped across town to redress the imbalances of the past. By 1973 with full integration finally achieved, Jefferson-Houston lost whatever identity it ever had as a community school.

Beyond history, however, there are other factors that contribute to the neighborhood's weakening ties to the school. One is changing demographics. The now-aging African-American population living in the historic district mostly finished educating their children before Jefferson-Houston opened. Their children prospered and had greater freedom of choice in selecting where they would live and educate their own families. They left the neighborhood in droves in the 1960s through the 1990s, and as a consequence today there is now little black middle class, intergenerational loyalty that might sustain the school through tough times. And the young white middle class now here in Parker-Gray prefer alternative schools.

Today, seven years after school redistricting essentially resegregated Alexandria's schools, Jefferson-Houston is a shadow of itself. Its open design, fashionable in the 1970s, is woefully out of date and its staff struggle to reach basic levels of academic performance. There are only 232 pupils enrolled this year, a drop of more than 17 percent from the previous year. That's a 65 percent decline when measured against the pre-redistricting 1999-2000 academic year enrollment of 669 students. And today's enrollment is less than a quarter of the enrollment in 1971, the school's first year.

Should Jefferson-Houston be kept open? Or should it be closed and dedicated to other uses, such as a center for special education students? (At one time there was talk that the School Board and the district's administrative offices might move to Cameron Street to save rent. That option recently disappeared when the City announced it was acquiring the site of the former Jefferson Memorial Hospital near I-395 in the West End.)

Could history be more easily transcended if a new school were to be built in Potomac Yard and Jefferson-Houston torn down, like its predecessors? Would the ghosts of the past finally be laid to rest if all of our neighborhood children could be sent there to mingle with the children from the new townhouses that will soon be rising up from the former rail yard?

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

I hope your research is accurate because the story is thought provoking. The decline in enrollment is proof of community's dissatisfaction with the school. The problem runs deeper than public housing students and I hope your readers will respond thoughtfully.

Anonymous said...

"(At one time there was talk that the School Board and the district's administrative offices might move to Cameron Street to save rent. That option recently disappeared when the City announced it was acquiring the site of the former Jefferson Memorial Hospital near I-395 in the West End.)"

It never ceases to amaze me how much knowledge you have on this community.

Last night I was talking to a school employee and asked him what was going to happen with J-H. He never mentioned the Jefferson Memorial Hospital site. He said that the recent talk he's heard, leads him to believe that they will probably close J-H and use it as the new school district HQ.

The city seems to be paying an outrageous rent (in the millions) for it's HQ on N. Beuregard St.

You have a school that is equipped to handle close to 500 children and have an enrollment no more than 232? Something is wrong here.

But we must remember that our city officials approve of concentrated public housing, in their eyes, what's the big deal in letting a mostly african-american school fail?

Anonymous said...

"Last night I was talking to a school employee and asked him what was going to happen with J-H. He never mentioned the Jefferson Memorial Hospital site."

Although the city has purchased the Jefferson Hospital site is the School Board not required to ratify a decision to move? Hopefully the School Board will decide to close Jefferson-Houston school. There is wisdom in such a decision. Has Mr. Campbell offered an opinion?

Anonymous said...

"Has Mr. Campbell offered an opinion?"

Come on now, if you know his name then you know who he is and what he is about. This school is his passion and he doesn't want it to close.

Who does? Some do and some don't. Fix the problem and stop shutting down things we are too lazy to try to change for the better.

The Growler said...

Bill Campbell was invited by the Growler to contribute a guest column on the school in advance of the Board meeting on 12/13, but he declined.

Anonymous said...

"Come on now, if you know his name then you know who he is and what he is about. This school is his passion and he doesn't want it to close."

Who spiked your breakfast coffee? Yes we know that Mr. Campbell is the President of the Jefferson Houston PTA but no we don't know his position regarding closing the school. It seems the school is in decline and closing it is a viable option. Land available is at Potomac Yard. The problem is more complex than the public housing banter spewed here special ed is part of the mix and healthy debate is needed.

Anonymous said...

"This school is his passion and he doesn't want it to close.

...and healthy debate is needed."

Healthy debate is definitely needed. Do I not remember that former School Board member and past PTA President Melissa Luby favors closing the school? Did PTA President Lisa Krupicka not make valiant efforts prior to deciding in favor of Mount Vernon? Presumably neither of these women is dumb. I would like to know what others will do differently given that much has already been tried.

Andrew Painter said...

I went to JHES between 1986 to 1989, and I recently walked through the school a year back. It had been a while, and it is incredible to see the changes in demography that occurred when ACPS' bussing/pairing of schools was phased out in the early 1990s.

I went on to Mary Washington College, got my masters in Urban Planning from U.Va., and graduated with my J.D. from the University of Richmond. I am now an attorney working in Leesburg, and I live in Tysons.

It is incredible the numbers of students who are below the poverty level, despite the immense changes that have taken place in Old Town.

I have had the priviledge to teach at both Mary Washington and Richmond, and I can tell you that my appreciation for racial diversity was fomented during my early years in that school. Indeed, I recently contacted my old principal, Ms. Howard, to express my thanks for her work while I was there.

I would love to help out any way I can with keeping the school open.

Anonymous said...

"I would like to know what others will do differently given that much has already been tried."

Send in another principal? Discontinue the arts focus for longer than the trial term? The School Board never funded the arts program in the first place. Let's build a new school in Potomac Yard.

Anonymous said...

"I can tell you that my appreciation for racial diversity was fomented during my early years in that school."

Mr. Painter

Yours is am impressive resume but I suspect a gentleman of your accomplishments had more than a good Principal guiding your way. My compliments to all who influenced your formative years. Personally I think it would be unfortunate for JH to become the city's symbol of diversity. Given the schools' demographics all city schools should promote diversity.

Anonymous said...

Can someone point to current statisitics on where J-H students actually live? And where are the parents living? Are the kids mostly from around here or are they mostly bused in from everywhere else? I see varying statements on the web ranging from "many are from nearby public housing," to "most are bused in from the west end." I'm not sure what we are dealing with now, in 2007, and therefore unsure of what the solutions could be.

One of the more thoughtful comments to the Growler's previous posting, the unofficial poll-by-numbers, a former resident pointed out that a good school is needed for lasting neighborhood stability and an informed interest in local affairs(and presumably, increased political clout that would benefit the 'hood), that without a good school, people will be short-termers, buying their starter homes here and moving on to their "real home" when the children reach school age. IMHO, any neighborhood benefits when residents stick around long enough to know their neighbors, learn about local goings-on, and devote some time to make our community a better place to live. If we are to keep young families, a good school is a basic service.

I don't have children, but do believe making a quality school available to children living in my neighborhood is critical not just to the children, but to all the neighborhood in the language we hear on the streets, the music that comes out of the cars, the number of local drop-outs who fall into the wrong crowd or are the wrong crowd, and the local sports games in the park.

But the first question for me is where is the hard data about where the kids are coming from in the first place.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Painter,
Do you keep in touch with any of your peers from your days in Jefferson Houston Elementary?
I would be very curious to know how there relative success.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Painter,
Do you keep in touch with any of your peers from your days in Jefferson Houston Elementary?
I would be very curious to know of their relative success.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Painter,
Do you keep in touch with any of your peers from your days in Jefferson Houston Elementary?
I would be very curious to know of their relative success.

Anonymous said...

"Mr. Painter

Yours is an impressive resume:

Are you the same Andrew Painter who works with development attorney Catherine Puskar, a development attorney whose client list includes the owners of Potomac Yard? If so you are indeed talented, but one wonders given your firm's professional affiliations if your want to keep Jefferson Houston elementary school open has been compromised.

Anonymous said...

" ... one wonders given your firm's professional affiliations if your want to keep Jefferson Houston elementary school open has been compromised."

Not sure what this means, but it does seem that no Potomac Yard resident in his right mind would want to have underachieving J-H youth attending the same school as their more privileged children.

Not exactly an attractive selling point for the Yard.

Andrew Painter said...

It’s hard for me to gauge the mood of this blog on this topic, and this, admittedly, is the first or second time I’ve ever blogged before. This is an issue I feel particularly passionate about. My love for this city is second to none, and I am always saddened to see what has happened to Old Town’s long-term residents, many of whom have been left behind in the regentrification shuffle that has revitalized most of the downtown area over the past three decades.

Our system of funding public education is really shameful in this country, especially compared to other western nations (Canada, Germany, Italy, Britain, Australia all come to mind) in terms of direct funding to schools received from general/federal and state/provincial-level governments. Certainly, the de jure segregationist days of the past are long behind us, but in their place have risen scores of de facto battles concerning school attendance boundaries. When one couples exclusionary zoning with public service funding formulas largely based upon a property tax that is collected and distributed at the local level, inter-local fragmentation becomes the rule, and the recipe for disparate levels of quality public education between jurisdictions (and even within jurisdictions such as Alexandria) is disastrous.

I am a firm believer in racial and economic diversity in public schools that reflects the overall demography of the population within the school division, and though the “pairing” of schools ended in the early 1990s (I did not appreciate the 40 minute bus ride to JHES), I can say that I feel better for having experienced it at a young age. I feel I have been very lucky to live in the times and places in which I have. There were many others who helped me along the way—but my formative years still mean the most to me, and I earnestly want to help those who followed me at Jefferson Houston.

You know, I can still recall my first day—I was so scared. We got off of the bus, and an administrator was yelling at us to walk in a straight line to the building entrance, and not deviate from the brick lines that still separate the concrete walkways in the front of the school. I can remember learning the Electric Slide for an ice cream social in the second grade. It was hilarious.

Perhaps pairing schools is no longer the answer, and perhaps it did not work well before. But the current regime of drawing school attendance boundaries that disproportionately concentrates so many of the city’s lower-income residents into one school is equally unfortunate.

I believe in the concept of neighborhood schools, and so naturally, I’d like to see it stay open (and as I’ve said before, I’d be happy to work with anyone seriously interested in keeping it open).

However, the ultimate goal is to make sure the students there have a quality public education. I would be more than happy to work with anyone on a plan that will enhance the educational opportunities of the students who remain, whether that’s at another building or not.

My email is andrewpainter@hotmail.com, and please feel free to contact me. Maybe I’ll see you all at the ACPS work session next week. It'll be the first one I've attended in 20 years. Take care!

Anonymous said...

It’s hard for me to gauge the mood of this blog on this topic,

"However, the ultimate goal is to make sure the students there have a quality public education.

I would be more than happy to work with anyone on a plan that will enhance the educational opportunities of the students who remain, whether that’s at another building or not."

I do not have children at JH, mine are grown, but I think all feel that children need a quality education. You had a good JH experience, you are a potential role model for the boys, but you were bussed to the school never lived in the neighborhood now live near Leesburg and have yet to disclose your relationship with Ms. Puskar's firm. What we need now is healthy debate not debate skewed or inflamed by others with ulterior or financial motives. The school building has a useful life, the current building is 30 years old and it seems logical to me to mix the JH population with others and move the school to Potomac Yard. So many of this neighborhood's problems stem from its segregated past and I would like the children given a fresh start in a new pristine building with all the best the school system has to offer. I don't think that is JH in its current state. You had a good principal. Recently JH has had rotating principals and the problems are not all because of lazy parents. The arts focus did not fail because of disinterested parents. You are proud alum and all should be proud of any young man who does well. The JH of today is not what it was in the earlier years.

Anonymous said...

Keeping the school open is in the interest of many, particularly moneyed interests who prefer that the disadvantaged children that attend J-H remain separate from other, more privileged parts of the City. Conveniently for the neo-segregationists, the City's policy of concentrated public housing guarantees the continued segregation of our schools (de facto, of course). City policies prevent our children from attending newer, better schools.

http://www.thelandlawyers.com/

Unless your efforts are beneficial to your law firm's clients, be it their interests in Potomac Yard or any others, you appear to be stepping into a professional conflict of interest.

And your recent post suggests that you now prefer to avoid openly discussing the issue in full view of the rest of us.

Anonymous said...

Close it down and send those kids to Potomac Yards. The school is nowhere near capacity and the poor students there have waited too long for a decent education. Enough.

It might also force the rest of the Alexandria residents (and the new residents of Potomac Yard) to come to terms with the City's longstanding policy of segregating it's public housing residents in one neighborhood.

trf said...

There is a downward spiral in two key areas that makes improvement efforts difficult - interest and involvement.

Many families with children see the quality of public schools as an important consideration in deciding where to live. When they see a school with poor performance they are less inclined to move here. So you have a lower influx of new students at all grade levels.

With fewer families moving into the neighborhood you have fewer students, and lower involvement in the local school. Potential new residents, as well as couples who have children while they live here, see that lower involvement and don't see a reason to move here or stick around. So the attendance as well as the involvement drop.

Stopping that pattern is not easy, and takes more than just a plea to local parents to re-consider the school and tweaking with the curriculum. My guess is that it would require a wholesale restructuring of attendance zones as well as curriculum. (Disclaimer: for our oldest child, who will enter school next year, we are looking at private, church-based schools).

New topic - One thing from this post that I cannot get out of my head - the picture of a Confederate Flag hanging in the council chambers back in the 70's. When I try to put the pieces together this is what I come up with: Racist white guys in the 60's and 70's (why else would they fly a confederate flag 100 years after the extirpation of that regime) create a segregated system of Housing Projects that concentrate poverty in one area.

Flash forward to 2007 and you have a much more diverse council, presumably without even a closeted rebel in the mix, defending the system that their predecessors established. I cannot come up with an explanation for this.

trf said...

"http://www.thelandlawyers.com/

Unless your efforts are beneficial to your law firm's clients, be it their interests in Potomac Yard or any others, you appear to be stepping into a professional conflict of interest."

I agree,but think it is more of an ethical issue than a conflict of interest. This does not pass the sniff test - a Lawyer working for a firm representing clients developing a new, nearby neighborhood posts responses to an item directly calling for a school in that neighborhood, and states his desire to keep the JH school open. He makes no mention of his employment. Presumably a school in Potomac Yard, with JH still open, will serve the residents of that new neighborhood and the eastern parts of Del Ray. Home prices go up, client happy, firm happy, bonuses all around.

At any rate some sunlight has been shed on the relationship, we can all place our own value on the comments.

Anonymous said...

Whats strange in this debate about keeping the school open is that several people here are letting their heart get in front of their head when it comes to the decision about keeping the school open.

What is currently occurring in our neighborhood that would make residents within the neighborhood want to send their kids there? We can comment about the arts focus or the principal or the public housing overconcentration, but in the end, its a public school. People have to want to have their children attend that school.

My experience in this neighborhood is that people do everything in their power, for the most part (and with exceptions) to not send their kids to JH. Either by not having kids or enrolling their kids in a private school.

So the only way it would seem that the school could be fixed is to change peoples perception of what JH is, which based on what I have seen so far, is not going to change anytime soon.

And an important point to remember in this whole argument of redistricting is that parents from other districts would have to be willing to send their students to JH. This is something I hilghly doubt can or would occur. What parent would want to send their kid to JH? We cant just say "districting is the problem" because if you redistrict, you still have the issue of parents from outside this area now sending their kids to JH, and we all know based on its reputation and this areas reputation that few if any parents are going to go along with that.

Anonymous said...

"Whats strange in this debate about keeping the school open is that several people here are letting their heart get in front of their head when it comes to the decision about keeping the school open.
"

I am glad someone brings these points up. In all this talk about how to save the school, one neglects to ask what causes people to not send their children there, or moreso, why many families in this neighborhood either neglect to have children or immediately move once they have them.

The solution seems to lie in evaluating the answers to those questions and building a solution around that, rather than posting nice language about diversity and being an alma mater.

Elizabeth said...

My son attended JH last year. (We moved over the summer, for reasons only partly relating to the school.)

I've spent a lot of time struggling with the question of why was Maury able to turn around while JHAA has not been (so far). I think there are two answers:

1) Consistent strong leadership -- JHAA has been sorely hurt by the constant turnover of principals, and it will take more than a few years to heal that damage

2) Maury's district is much more compact, so it feels like a neighborhood school. It's one thing to say "I don't want to put my kid on a bus, so I'll fight to improve the local school." It's another thing when there's a much better school that is equally close (as is the case for Maury and MVCS for many of the families zoned for JHAA).

I think Bill Campbell is right that a critical mass of involved parents could make a huge difference, but I don't see how you get there. Without such a mass, the involved parents just wind up burnt out, without having made a difference.

(For what it's worth, our new school is still very economically disadvantaged, although not as much so as JHAA. And the difference at PTA events is astonishing.

Anonymous said...

I think elizabeth may have summed up part of the problem with her example of a parent who says "I don't want to put my kid on a bus."

I think most parents already put their children on a bus or drive them to school; perhaps some are even able to walk with them, weather and time permitting. I don't imagine that many 1st-3rd graders are leaving home to wait for the bus or walk to school alone, at least I hope so since adults are being mugged, beaten up, and knifed during the morning hours. I also think most people reading this blog accept that J-H is not a good school.

So if most parents already invest a certain amount of time in getting their children to school, let's call it 10 minutes, why wouldn't they add on an extra 5, 10 even 20 minutes driving them to a good school or even putting them on a bus? Perhaps the only only parents who aren't willing to invest this time are those who don't know their children can attend a better school and/or parents who don't value education as highly as they should?

So in my mind while J-H is a segregated school and I can't imagine any intelligent, caring person actually creating this horror of a school district, I also think it is somewhat of a self-imposed segregation.

Personally I have walked by the J-H playground during and after school hours and wouldn't want to send my young, impressionable child there. I actually applaud every parent who finds a way to avoid this school, I just hope they also send a scathing letter to the mayor and the ACPS http://www.acps.k12.va.us/feedback.php especially if you move to avoid this school.