Friday, September 07, 2007

In the Air

On Wednesday, the Growler ankled down to City Hall to get back into the swing of the civic thing after a long holiday.

The target: a meeting of the ARHA Redevelopment Work Group.

In attendance were ARHA Chairman and Vice Chairman Melvin Miller and Connie Ring, acting ARHA CEO Roy Priest, Mayor William D. Euille, Councilman Rob Krupicka, Planning Commission Chair Eric Wagner, City Manager James Hartmann, and key City staff like Housing Director Mildrilyn Davis.

And boy, the Cranky One's attendance was timely. There are some major developments underway that affect our neighborhood directly or indirectly.

First, the City still appears poised to partner with EYA on the tandem redevelopment of Glebe Park and James Bland. As before, EYA is counting on the greater potential value of market rate units at Bland to help subsidize the immediate redevelopment of Glebe Park.

To start with, however, the City will have to free ARHA from the troubled Glebe Park project's mortgage, which is in imminent danger of foreclosure by HUD. A bailout is apparently going to be discussed in executive session at the Council's first hearing of the new fiscal year on Tuesday, September 11.

At the same time, it's clear that the City has been using the possibility of a bailout as leverage to get a true picture of ARHA's financial position.

A joint ARHA/City strategic plan is being drafted, and ARHA has been asked to submit information about every topic under the sun, including sources of operating and capital funding, age and condition of its housing inventory, renter demographics and turnover, copies of organizational charts and policies and procedures, and detail on staffing levels. (Growler will scan and post a copy of the "Outline of Information and Analysis Needs" next week.) A financial consultant is going to be retained to help with the analysis.

Kudos to the politicians and City staff for trying to shed light on ARHA's viability as a going concern before they kick in more dollars.

But now there's another twist. In July HUD announced that significant HOPE VI grant money may once again be available for the transformation of traditional public housing projects into mixed-income developments. If readers remember, HOPE VI is the same program that made possible the evolution of the notorious Berg project into today's Chatham Square.

ARHA leaders believe they could potentially secure as much as $20 million in funding with a successful HOPE VI application. This would amply cover the payback of the City's bridge loans to ARHA needed to retire the HUD mortgage and get EYA started on the first phase of the redevelopment.

ARHA is definitely interested in pursuing the new monies. But City staff expressed their misgivings because the application for HOPE VI is due November 7 and will involve a substantial amount of work in a short period of time. Not only must three public and resident meetings be held prior to submission, there must also be a proposed plan — not just for Glebe Park, but also for Bland.

Planning & Zoning Director Faroll Hamer expressed her concerns on two fronts. First, she's getting ready to kick off the "Braddock East Concept Plan," a planning process that will review not only the redevelopment of Bland but also plan the future of all ARHA properties in our area, including Andrew Adkins, Samuel Madden Uptown, and Ramsey Homes. It seems there will be a stakeholder group formed, just as there was for Glebe Park.

There's also the derailed Braddock Road Metro Small Area Plan. Ms. Hamer reminded everyone about the upcoming September 24 meeting, but on one of the handouts for the Wednesday meeting it appears she will also be proposing something called the "Braddock Metro Neighborhood Advisory Group" which will meet every two weeks through January.

Hmmmmmm .... What is that group's charter and who will be tapped to join it?

Ms. Hamer said she is worried the public is going to be confused by all of these meetings. She and Planning Commission Chairman Wagner also expressed fears that the neighborhood would misconstrue the draft plan for Bland that is required for the HOPE VI submission on November 7 — that we will take it as a done deal cooked up behind closed doors without public input.

As several members of the group were careful to point out, the initial plan could change after the HUD grant application is submitted, and veterans noted that the details of the Chatham Square proposal morphed considerably after HOPE VI monies were approved.

Nevertheless, Ms. Hamer is correct. This is going to be confusing.

And let's step back a moment to look at the bigger picture. It's now becoming clear that critical decisions are being made for the neighborhood through processes other than the Braddock Road Metro Small Area Plan. An ARHA track now needs to be added to the list, along with the Ad Hoc Transportation Task Force operating under T&ES's umbrella.

This is a mess of the City's own creation. Who is going to coordinate the work of all of the groups? Which recommendations prevail in case of overlap or contradiction?

And there are still mysteries waiting to be unraveled. Last fall EYA proposed a three-pronged public housing redevelopment that included Andrew Adkins. Then Adkins abruptly fell off the negotiating table.

Why? With its proximity to Metro, Adkins is the most valuable property in the portfolio. Neighbors near Braddock Metro are going to be asking what happened. Do all trails lead to the Planning & Zoning Department and their rigid insistence on an unwanted ARHA high-rise and a reopening of the 700 block of Payne Street?

So brace yourselves for a even busier fall schedule than the Growler first anticipated. There will be a lot of balls in the air and its unlikely the City can juggle them all effectively.

11 Comments:

At Sun Sep 09, 09:57:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yay, Growler!! Great info. Thanks for going to that meeting. What would we do without you??

Damn straight I'll be at these upcoming meetings, thanks to you. Thanks for keeping us in the know.

I might add a comment about how ridiculous it is that they are getting ready to demolish and rebuild the Charles Houston rec center, prior to knowing what is going to happen to Bland. Shouldn't that be part of the same plan for the Braddock area?

Speaking of confusion, anyone have any idea if the Mayor's walk is still on for Thursday, the 13th?

 
At Mon Sep 10, 07:28:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Would this explain why there is so much activity going on around Adkins in regards to architects/city bureaucrats?

All weekend there were people out and about the projects with clipboards, carefully observing and taking notes. From cars to walking around, it appears people with clipboards and architects plans have been all over that property for weeks now.

One would think that someone down at City Hall finally had a lightbulb pop on in their head, but again, this is Alexandria.

 
At Mon Sep 10, 09:06:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"First, she's getting ready to kick off the "Braddock East Concept Plan,"

i have not previously heard the proposed cdd referred to as the braddock east concept plan but people should pay attention not only because of the public housing units involved but the height and density desired with the becp.

 
At Mon Sep 10, 09:40:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I might add a comment about how ridiculous it is that they are getting ready to demolish and rebuild the Charles Houston rec center, prior to knowing what is going to happen to Bland. Shouldn't that be part of the same plan for the Braddock area?"

I believe the Mayor said no matter what, public housing is staying right where it is, it will just be new and improved. So it appears they are just moving forward with Charles Houston under the assumption that someday, in the la-la land that is City politics, someone will rebuild Bland for them and then the new rec center will simply be surrounded by new and improved public housing.

 
At Mon Sep 10, 11:00:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I might add a comment about how ridiculous it is that they are getting ready to demolish and rebuild the Charles Houston rec center, prior to knowing what is going to happen to Bland. Shouldn't that be part of the same plan for the Braddock area?"

Nothing about the preparation of the Braddock Plan has been logical. The challenges for Hamer are many and she should begin by proving to us that she is a skilled planner first and foremost. I am surprised that you hold out hope the process is honorable. Kramer's hiring was insulting at best, no substantive changes to the Plan are under consideration, and Kramer's outputs will likely be based more on the city's wants.

 
At Mon Sep 10, 11:36:00 AM EST, Blogger The Growler said...

So you're suggesting that the proposed Braddock Metro Advisory Group will be a sham?

 
At Mon Sep 10, 01:56:00 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You bet it's confusing.
Braddock? I thought it was Old Town. Cromley says it's Old Town on Queen Street, see the website for his Laundry project, http://www.cromleylofts.com - and
The Monarch at Oronoco and Henry says that "Old Town is spreading its wings."

If there is a Braddock East, where is the plan for Braddock West? Someone is trying hard to bend reality to their vision.

 
At Mon Sep 10, 03:37:00 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just want to know how you can have ARHA meetings and Plan meetings without the affordable housing chapter of the Plan and without a high-level strategic plan for all the ARHA properties.

What is the point of Planning if options are essentially unknown or off the table?

 
At Mon Sep 10, 03:39:00 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Speaking of confusion, anyone have any idea if the Mayor's walk is still on for Thursday, the 13th?"

Now there's a joke!

 
At Mon Sep 10, 07:27:00 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

"So you're suggesting that the proposed Braddock Metro Advisory Group will be a sham?"

Especially if chaired by either Kramer or city staff.

 
At Tue Sep 11, 08:02:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

fyi - I attended a neighborhood meeting about the demolition of Charles Houston Rec Center. If you have any problems during the demolition and construction, here is the contact:

Adrian Dayan
202-439-6542 (cell)
adrian.dayan@cox.net.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home