The Growler has discovered something quite interesting about the evolution of Landbay L over at Potomac Yard.Remember, this is the big open space across the railroad tracks from the Braddock Road Metro station, which is currently being cleared.
Check out the the map of Landbay L and the Braddock Area on the right. It displays the terminus of the proposed new Main Street, which will run through Potomac Yard. See the Growler's earlier posting Can a Picture Paint A Thousand Words? for a photograph looking south toward King Street.
Ya want to understand these details or you'll miss the impact of what the Curmudgeon is going to tell ya.
The developer of Potomac Yard originally proposed greater density on Landbay L specifically due to its proximity to the Braddock Road Metro.
But the proposal was slashed both in terms of density and height at the recommendation of City staff. Those recommendations were then accepted by Council and Planning Commission.
Transit oriented development? The Growler doesn't think so. Read on ...
Remember that according to a June 2006 City presentation to the Del Ray Citizens Association, Landbay L (the "Braddock Neighborhood") is currently slated to have 358 residential units, 473,000 square feet of commercial and office space, plus another 10,000 sf in street retail.
But according to the Potomac Yard Coordinated Development District (CDD) Plan #99-01 staff report, developer Commonwealth Atlantic originally proposed 673,000 square feet of commercial and office space and 319 residences.
But after a discussion of the feasibility of straightening the Monroe Avenue Bridge (now a done deal), here's what staff recommended:South of Monroe Avenue Bridge (Landbay “L”)
South of the existing Monroe Avenue bridge, on the 11 acre landbay “L”, the applicant is proposing another concentration of high density office uses--673,000 square feet--and 319 multifamily residential units. The applicant has indicated that density is being concentrated in this area because it is the portion of the site closest to the Braddock Road Metrorail station. Heights are proposed at 110' for up to four buildings, with the majority of heights reaching no higher than 60’.
The project’s Main Street continues under the Monroe Avenue bridge into this portion of the project, providing the only vehicular access into the area. Main Street extends to the southern portion of the site to culminate in a cul-de-sac located approximately 675' feet from Braddock Road. This cul-desac is proposed to be a drop-off point to the Metrorail for the proposed shuttle bus system serving the Yard. No vehicular connections are provided to the neighborhoods to the west, although pedestrian connections are suggested to align with existing streets in the area. (Emphasis added) (CDD #99-01, page 26)
The Growler doesn't even know where to begin.Regardless of whether or not the bridge is straightened, staff believes the amount of office within this area should be decreased. The applicant proposes the highest concentration of office--673,000 sq.ft.--at this difficult location, arguing that it is the most Metro accessible area within the Yard. While it is true that this site is physically the closest to Metrorail, it is still 1,500-2,500 ft. walk from the station to the location of the proposed office uses. And more significantly, this site has the worst vehicular access of any area in the Yard, unless the bridge is straightened. And, if the bridge is straightened, high levels of office use become somewhat less appropriate because of the increased connectedness to the adjoining low scale residential neighborhoods.
Therefore, staff is recommending that office uses be shifted from this area under either scenario. If the bridge is straightened, at least 200,000 sq.ft. of office should be shifted from this area to the Town Center to enhance that center of development. The applicant has indicated that they would prefer to eliminate all office uses from this landbay if the staff’s concept plan (without the bridge straightening) is approved, shifting them to the Town Center and throughout Landbays “H”, “I”, and “J”. With the second playfield located in this area under that scenario, the applicant feels that insufficient space is available to create a true office center. Development within this landbay would then become all residential use, with a small amount of retail, which staff supports and finds a more plausible use for this area than office.
Staff is recommending that heights in this area be decreased from the 110'maximum proposed by the applicant to a maximum of 82', with the majority of heights less than 60' and reducing as the lower neighborhoods to the west are approached. Staff does not support the increase from the 77' now permitted by the master plan for this area, which is predominately low scale in nature. A minor increase to 82' is reasonable to allow retail uses on the first floor; this is the height of office buildings on Duke Street and at the King Street. (CDD # 99-01, pp. 28-29) (Emphasis added)
First, the staff suggested shifting 200,000 sq ft of density away from a Metro site and at a location (Potomac Yard Town Center) that doesn't have a Metro station now and is unlikely to ever have one, despite the fact that the plan optimistically reserves some space for it.
Does this make sense?
Then, we are told that a walk of 1,500 to 2,500 feet is too far for someone to use Metro. Bollocks! The Growler walks more than that twice a day to the Metro, and it's only a four and a half block walk. Anyone on the Del Ray or Rosemont side who currently walks to Metro travels at least as far and probably much further.
Just what does the City define as a cachement area for Metro service? Two blocks and y'er out?
Next, it sounds like the shuttle bus (and make no mistake, that's all the Potomac Yard BRT is) was originally going to terminate on the western side of the Metro. Now BRT from the Yard is proposed to go down First Street, Fayette and Madison to the station. Why was this moved to our side?
And finally, the staff demonstrated a tender concern for height and its impact on the lower-scale Del Ray neighborhood nearby by insisting that no structures be taller than 82', with most at 60'. Yet for the "Northern Gateway" section of the Braddock Road Plan, the proposed CDD designation for the Jaguar property will permit heights of up to 150'.
It's time to end the discrimination. We need to demand that the City reopen the Potomac Yard Plan and propose the same density and height that we are getting on the eastern side.
Grrrrrrrrrrrrrr!!!!
22 comments:
"Anyone on the Del Ray or Rosemont side who currently walks to Metro travels at least as far and probably much further."
We do, I walk from E. Nelson down Mt. Vernon to Braddock on an everyday basis and I'm not alone. There and back is about 1.25 miles a day.
GRRRRR is RRRIGHT!!
By its plan, City Hall has shown the appropriate density and uses for 360 degrees AROUND METRO.
Anything less is discrimination borne of outdated racist policies. The City could wind up with more to deal with than just the Mirant Plant.
I love how the Council and the Commission keep talking about "walkability" to the Metro.
Fat chance of walking when people constantly see things like this every week. Most people will just get in their car rather than face the possibility of thugging...
300 block of East Braddock Road 6/27 at 3:10 a.m. Victim, an 18-year-old Alexandria man, was robbed of personal property by force. The suspects are described as five black males. There were no injuries.
You forgot the funniest part. They are planning to build more ballfields in this landbay even thouhg they already have the Embarassment Formerly Known as Braddock Field there.
So essentially, the west side of smart growth will be a 7-11 which is the new hangout for neighborhood riffraff, a beat up old computer shop that should be condemned, 3 ballfields (1 of which is a running joke) and a school.
Arlington City planners need to sit down with Faroll, Melvin, and William and give them a lesson in Economics 101....or maybe just hit them over the head with a 2x4 a few times.
HAVE THESE PEOPLE NEVER SEEN, USED OR IMAGINED A FOOT TUNNEL OR FOOT BRIDGE CONNECTING METRO OVER OR UNDER EXISTING RAILROAD TRACKS?
Many, many other cities utilize foot bridges to carry people over the tracks, better yet, if we can spend the money to add another entrance to the metro at King street--why could we not add another entrance at Braddock, as had been discussed and poo pooed earlier in the process, connecting the metro by tunnel from the West (who on the Del Ray side wouldn't want to get out of the heat/snow faster)?
WHY? BECAUSE THE COUNCIL LACKS POLITICAL WILL--ITS NOT ABOUT THE MONEY, THEY ALWAYS MANAGE TO FIND THE MONEY TO DO THE THINGS THEY WANT TO DO.
WHY? BECAUSE THE COUNCIL LACKS VISION FOR ALEXANDRIA BEING ANYTHING OTHER THAN A CITY DIVIDED BY RACE AND CLASS and it continues to set policy based on antiquated thinking about what our neighborhood is and should be.
Demand is right. I hope people forward this string right on to Council. We should demand that Land Bay L be opened, that the plan for the 7-11 track be part of the plan, that strategies for moving people BY FOOT across the tracks be included in the plan that some of the existing density from the east side be moved to the West of Braddock and to other areas of the Potomac Yard plan.
"Then, we are told that a walk of 1,500 to 2,500 feet is too far for someone to use Metro. Bollocks!"
Many people make that walk from North Old Town to Braddock every day and night. Especially through the housing projects.
Not that City planners show any concern for them...none of them get free shuttle buses through known high-crime areas....
"Demand is right. I hope people forward this string right on to Council. We should demand that Land Bay L be opened, that the plan for the 7-11 track be part of the plan, that strategies for moving people BY FOOT across the tracks be included in the plan that some of the existing density from the east side be moved to the West of Braddock and to other areas of the Potomac Yard plan. "
Fat chance...they are too busy trying to find a way to bail out ARHA. Love how they can find 6 million to keep funding that mess....
This headline from the Times was funny in 2 respects:
Safer walks at Braddock Metro area complete
June 28, 2007
Pedestrians who walk to the Braddock Road Metro Station from Rosemont will have a safer commute because of new sidewalks on the north side of Braddock Road. As part of the city’s commitment to improving pedestrian safety, there is now a sidewalk on the north side of Braddock Road from Newton to Ramsay and from Newton to Commonwealth Avenue.
“A five-foot wide sidewalk may not seem like such a big project but it is huge for the people who live in the neighborhood,” said Richard Baier, director of Transportation and Environmental Services for the City. “People can now safely walk to George Washington Middle School and to the athletic fields there and to Maury Elementary School.”
According to Baier, “There have never been sidewalks on the north sides of Braddock Road and it was not an easy project. It was tricky to design sidewalks in this area because it is very flat and doesn’t have good drainage,” Baier said. “Our engineer, Craig Perl, worked very hard to design this project to make it the best it could be.”
In addition to the sidewalks, six intersections will be improved with pavers and curb cuts. The first phase of the project costs $155,000 and the second phase, which will include narrowing the intersection at Masonic View and Braddock to discourage cut-through traffic, is ready for bid.
1. Sidewalks for Delray, yet we cant even get trash cans from the City. Oh, and we cant get safer sidewalks either, because Euielle would rather just let ARHA keep us safe.
2. Let me see, this gets posted today and then I check the crime report and VOILA!
300 block of East Braddock Road 6/27 at 3:10 a.m. Victim, an 18-year-old Alexandria man, was robbed of personal property by force. The suspects are described as five black males. There were no injuries.
LOVELY! Does Baier have any way to keep the sidewalks safe from thugs? I am sure all those Rosemont commuters are going to want to head down Braddock Road now.....
The process is entirely political. The fact that the Mayor has rescheduled his neighborhood walk for September adds weight to the argument. The walk is no longer about crime but rather a public relations ploy intended to coincide with the Fall movement of the Braddock Road Small Area Plan.
I appreciate the Growler's impressive research but the findings have long been known. You offer nothing new. My question is at what point is the neighborhood going to demand its fair share. I refer to more than public housing. The politicians need to feel our wrath. It's body count not emails that will finally get their attention. I hope no one is too busy to attend the Fall hearings. To speak against discrimination over and over and over again.
Re Braddock. How ironic that the plantation overseer is a former slave. Lest you think me disrespectful Euille's screw you attitude beats Donley's any day. He's looking for a bigger political pound and we are the worms he plans to use as bait.
Then Becker's initial reference to 360 degrees is true. No wonder she was named a Living Legend.
My question is at what point is the neighborhood going to demand its fair share. I refer to more than public housing. The politicians need to feel our wrath. It's body count not emails that will finally get their attention. I hope no one is too busy to attend the Fall hearings. To speak against discrimination over and over and over again.
I don't intend to wait. We can show up at public meetings any time and make our presence known. Look at the tenacity of our Route 1 neighbor Ms. Landis.
My question is at what point is the neighborhood going to demand its fair share. I refer to more than public housing. The politicians need to feel our wrath. It's body count not emails that will finally get their attention. I hope no one is too busy to attend the Fall hearings. To speak against discrimination over and over and over again.
We don't need to wait until the Fall hearings, we can hound Council at any public meeting.
This headline from the Times was funny in 2 respects:
Safer walks at Braddock Metro area complete
June 28, 2007
Pedestrians who walk to the Braddock Road Metro Station from Rosemont
It also verifies that the Braddock Metro area is considered the area SURROUNDING the Braddock Metro. The Divison between East and West is a CITY holdover borne of outdated discriminatory policies. Is there anyone on Council that can see past their own upbringing?
"I don't intend to wait. We can show up at public meetings any time and make our presence known. Look at the tenacity of our Route 1 neighbor Ms. Landis."
So nice of you to note Mrs. Landis' many efforts. Like you I appreciate her commitment to the rest of us.
"Then Becker's initial reference to 360 degrees is true."
Would she consider leading us now? The Plan is such a mess and I have no confidence in process ongoing now.
Really, why the discrimination in terms of east v west? I just don't buy the racism argument.
Incompetence, maybe? Self-interest, more likely? Del Ray is much better organized than we are.
But if the mayor has aspirations beyond Alexandria (and we can only hope his wishes come true SOON), then why alienate developers who can fund your statewide campaign? After all, the developers don't care whether their density comes in the east or west side of the tracks, preferably both, I'd imagine.
And why keep public housing? Certainly, the developers can't like it. Inertia? Lack of creativity?
Would she consider leading us now? The Plan is such a mess and I have no confidence in process ongoing now.
I for one would set aside time to actively fight this mess if we had some savvy, strong leadership.
The fact that the Mayor has rescheduled his neighborhood walk for September adds weight to the argument.
Think he can handle the September heat?
"It's time to end the discrimination. We need to demand that the City reopen the Potomac Yard Plan and propose the same density and height that we are getting on the eastern side."
You can demand all you want. Its become pretty clear to me that that the City doesnt want to listen on either density or public housing, preferring to listen to the City overall rather than the neighborhood in general.
"The fact that the Mayor has rescheduled his neighborhood walk for September adds weight to the argument.
Think he can handle the September heat? "
Nope, and that also falls right near the time of the Charles Houston shut down, which means things really might start cooking.....
Why keep the public housing?
PlayPlaying devil's advocate for a moment.
If ARHA chose to sell most of their
properties, where would all the
unemployed, single parent, recovering
drug addicts be expected to live? What
about the twenty-something drug dealers
who have made public housing communites
their home? What about unwed teen
mothers who are living entirely off
public assistance? Perhaps these folks
could be moved out to Manassas, or a
small town in West Virginia?
Regardless, they would all need a place
to go, and few, if any, would be
interested in actually working for a
living. Until someone comes up with a
viable solution, I think we are stuck
with the public housing as it stands.
g as it stands.
g as it stands.
onvincing ARHA to do a bit of landscaping in the burg, but I suspect that is a pipe dream.
am.
am.
Post a Comment